|
| 基于生态功能区尺度的社会-生态恢复力评价研究 |
| Assessment of social-ecological resilience based on the scale of ecological function area |
| Received:July 27, 2021 |
| DOI：10.13254/j.jare.2021.0461 |
| 中文关键词: 生态修复，恢复力，多准则评价，生态功能区，社会-生态系统 |
| 英文关键词: ecological restoration, resilience, multi-criteria assessment, ecological function area, socio-ecological system |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（41807515，51874307）；江苏省自然资源科技计划项目（2020028） |
| Author Name | Affiliation | E-mail | | ZHANG Yiyan | School of Public Policy & Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221100, China | | | ZHANG Shaoliang | School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221100, China | | | YANG Yongjun | School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221100, China | y.yang@cumt.edu.cn | | HOU Huping | School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221100, China | |
|
| Hits: 827 |
| Download times: 1576 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为定量评估生态功能单元的社会-生态恢复力，采用多准则评价、相关性分析方法，构建全国尺度的社会-生态恢复力指标体系，探讨了我国各生态功能区的社会-生态恢复力水平。结果表明，国土空间生态系统的社会-生态恢复力水平由自然和社会两方面特征决定，恢复力水平具有明显的区域性差异。从全国尺度来看，自然生态恢复力水平指数在0.10~0.56区间内，呈南方高、北方低的格局，受系统慢变量特征影响显著；社会经济恢复力水平指数在0.18~0.93区间内，呈中部及沿海地区高、其他地区低的格局，由系统的社会资本、交叠管理、创新性等特征的差异导致。研究表明，基于恢复力准则构建恢复力评价指标体系可以有效揭示区域恢复力格局，我国国土空间生态修复的整体区划和工程布局应考虑各生态功能单元社会-生态恢复力的异质性，并根据社会和自然生态恢复力的综合水平制定差异性的修复策略。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| To quantitatively assess the socio-ecological resilience of ecological function area, multi-criteria evaluation and correlation analysis were used to construct a national-scale socio-ecological resilience index system and explore the socio-ecological resilience level of each ecological function area in China. The results showed that the level of socio-ecological resilience of ecosystems is determined by both ecological and social characteristics of the system, and there are obvious regional differences in the level of resilience. On a national scale, the ecological resilience index ranges from 0.10 to 0.56, with high in the south and low in the north, which is significantly influenced by the characteristics of the slow variables of the system; the social resilience index ranges from 0.18 to 0.93, with high in the central and coastal regions and low in other regions, which is caused by the differences of the social capital, overlapping management, and innovation of the system. The construction of a resilience evaluation index system based on resilience guidelines can effectively reveal regional resilience patterns. The overall zoning and engineering layout of ecological restoration in China 's national land space should consider the heterogeneity of socio-ecological resilience of each ecological function area, and develop differentiated restoration strategies based on the integrated level of social and ecological resilience. |
| HTML
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
