|
| 农户感知生态系统服务与生计韧性的耦合协调关系及其影响因素——以湖北大别山区为例 |
| Coupled coordination relationship between households' perceived ecosystem services and livelihood resilience and its influencing factors:taking the Dabie Mountains in Hubei as an example |
| 投稿时间：2024-08-12 |
| DOI：10.13254/j.jare.2024.0630 |
| 中文关键词: 感知生态系统服务，生计韧性，耦合协调度，多尺度地理加权回归，大别山区，湖北 |
| 英文关键词: perceived ecosystem service, livelihood resilience, coupled coordination degree, multi-scale geographic weighted regression, Dabie Mountainous area, Hubei Province |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（42371315，41901213） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 205 |
| 全文下载次数: 243 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为揭示生态系统服务与农户生计韧性之间的复杂关联机制，本研究通过参与式农村评估和问卷调查在湖北大别山区采集522份微观农户调研数据，构建农户感知生态系统服务和生计韧性测度指标体系，借助耦合协调度模型探析两者之间的耦合协调特征，采用多尺度地理加权回归（MGWR）模型探究影响耦合协调度的关键因素及其空间异质性规律。结果表明：农户感知生态系统服务指数位于低、较低、中等、较高、高值区间的样本占比分别为13.79%、22.80%、27.59%、25.29%、10.54%，整体处于中等水平；其中，供给服务得分最高，支持服务和文化服务相对较低。农户生计韧性指数分布于低、较低、中等、较高、高值区间的农户占比分别为9.01%、20.50%、29.69%、27.20%、13.60%，其中社会安全网仍是发展短板，乡村治理仍需强化。农户感知生态系统服务与生计韧性的耦合协调度主要处于初级协调阶段。健康状况、参加培训人数、社会网络规模、社会互动、社会网络质量、资源分配公平程度、到县城时间、道路整洁度、建筑格局、绿化程度和转移性补贴是影响二者耦合协调度的关键因素。研究表明，应加强乡村社会安全网和乡村治理，提升绿色生态发展，注重生态环境保护和社会经济发展的协调，并从多维度增强二者的协调发展水平，以实现区域生态与经济发展的双赢。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| To reveal the complex interrelationships between ecosystem services and the resilience of farm households' livelihoods, the study collected 522 household samples in the Dabie mountainous region of Hubei Province using participatory rural appraisal and questionnaires. Then a set of indicators was designed to assess households' perceived ecosystem services and livelihood resilience, and the coupled coordination degree model was adopted to analyze the interrelationship between households' perceived ecosystem services and their livelihood resilience. Furthermore, the study investigated the key factors influencing this coupled coordination relationship and evaluated their spatial heterogeneity patterns using a multi-scale geographically weighted regression model. The findings demonstrated that households' overall perceived ecosystem service was at a moderate level, with sample proportions in the low, relatively low, medium, high, and very high being 13.79%, 22.80%, 27.59%, 25.29%, and 10.53%, respectively. Provisioning services scored highest, while support and cultural services scored relatively lower. Regarding households' livelihood resilience, the sample proportions in the low, relatively low, medium, high, and very high were 9.01%, 20.50%, 29.69%, 27.20%, and 13.60%, respectively, suggesting substantial potential for enhancing social safety nets and rural governance. The coupled coordination degree of households' perceived ecosystem services and livelihood resilience was primarily in the initial coordination stage. Key factors influencing the coupling coordination degree include health, training participation, social network size, social interaction, the quality of social networks, equity in resource distribution, time to the nearest down town, road cleanliness, building patterns, green coverage, and transfer subsidies. Consequently, it is imperative to strengthen rural social safety nets and governance, promote green eco-development, and balance eco-environmental protection with socio-economic development. The results indicated that enhancing the level of coordinated development from a multidimensional perspective is essential for achieving a win-win scenario for regional ecological and economic development. |
| HTML
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
