|
| 基于“三生”视角的云南省农村人居环境质量评价、时空分异及驱动因素 |
| Evaluation，spatial and temporal differentiation，and driving factors of rural habitat quality in Yunnan Province based on the perspective of“production-life-ecology” |
| 投稿时间：2024-01-31 |
| DOI：10.13254/j.jare.2024.0073 |
| 中文关键词: 农村人居环境，时空演化，驱动因素，区域差异，云南省 |
| 英文关键词: rural human settlement, spatial and temporal evolution, driving factor, regional difference, Yunnan Province |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（72261035）；云南省教育合作人文社科项目（SYSX202202）；云南省应用基础研究农业联合专项面上项目（202101BD070001-061）；教育部人文社会科学研究项目（22XJA630006） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 431 |
| 全文下载次数: 291 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为科学评价云南省农村人居环境质量并解析其时空演变特征及驱动因素，本研究通过构建云南省农村人居环境评价指标体系，运用加权求和法对其进行综合评价，同时结合ArcGIS空间分析法、地理探测器模型探究其时空分异特征及驱动因素。结果表明：2012—2021年云南省农村人居环境质量整体提升显著，评价分数由2012年的0.292上升到2021年的0.418；各子系统上，生产、生活系统质量呈逐年上升趋势，生产系统评价分数由2012年的0.223上升至2021年的0.470，生活系统由2012年的0.260上升至2021年的0.392，而生态系统质量呈波动下降趋势，评价分数由2012年的0.537下降至2021年的0.442。从空间上来看，云南省农村人居环境提升显著，但各地区空间格局差异明显，整体上呈现出滇中地区高于其他地区的空间格局；生态系统呈现出滇西北、滇东北、滇西地区高于滇东、滇中地区的空间分布特征；生产系统、生活系统都呈现出滇中、滇东北、滇东南高于滇西北、滇西南的空间分异特征。从驱动因素上分析，生活因素是影响云南省农村人居环境的主要驱动力，农村人居环境质量发展受多种因素共同作用的影响。未来应结合不同区域间子系统的差异，因地制宜，最大化统筹生产、生活、生态环境三个子系统协调发展，促进整体农村人居环境质量持续提升。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| To provide a reference for rural habitat management, rural habitat quality in Yunnan Province was scientifically evaluated and its spatial and temporal evolution characteristics and driving factors were analyzed. This was done by constructing the evaluation index system of rural habitat environments in Yunnan Province and using the weighted summation method to carry out a comprehensive evaluation. Additionally, the ArcGIS spatial analysis method and geo-detector model were combined to explore the spatio-temporal differentiation characteristics and driving factors. The overall quality of rural habitats in Yunnan Province has improved significantly, with the evaluation score rising from 0.292 in 2012 to 0.418 in 2021. In the subsystems, the quality of production and living systems showed a rising yearly trend from 0.223 in 2012 to 0.470 in 2021 and from 0.260 in 2012 to 0.392 in 2021, respectively. While the quality of ecosystem showed a fluctuating downward trend from 0.537 in 2012 to 0.442 in 2021. Spatially, in Yunnan Province, the agricultural human environment has improved significantly, but the spatial pattern of each region varied significantly. When viewed holistically, the rural human settlement environment quality in the central Yunnan region surmounted that of other regions. In terms of ecosystem quality, northwest, northeast, and western Yunnan regions outstripped the eastern and central Yunnan areas. In addition, the quality of production system and living system both showed the spatial characteristics that central Yunnan, northeast Yunnan and southeast Yunnan were better than northwest Yunnan and southwest Yunnan. Regarding driving factors, living factors were the main driving force influencing rural habitat in Yunnan Province, and the development of rural habitat quality was influenced by a variety of factors. In the future, we should combine the subsystem differences among different regions, tailor resources to local conditions, maximize the coordinated development of the three subsystems of production, living, and ecological environment, and promote sustainable improvement of the quality of the overall rural habitat environment. |
| HTML
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
