文章摘要
“三生”功能视角下城市近郊区村庄发展适宜性评价与分类——以江西抚州临川区为例
Evaluation and classification of village development quality in suburban areas from the perspective of “production-life-ecological”function:a case from Linchuan District, Fuzhou, Jiangxi Province, China
投稿时间:2023-08-15  修订日期:2023-11-15
DOI:10.13254/j.jare.2023.0524
中文关键词: 村庄规划,“三生”功能,村庄评价,村庄分类,临川区
英文关键词: village planning, “production-life-ecological”function, village evaluation, village classification, Linchuan District
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(72274089);江西省社会科学规划项目(21SH03);江西省社会科学基金项目(21GL42);江西省研究生创新基金课题(YC2022—s072)
作者单位
曾艳 南昌大学公共政策与管理学院, 南昌 330031
南昌大学中国乡村振兴研究院/城乡治理与共同富裕研究中心, 南昌 330031 
廖成浩 南昌大学公共政策与管理学院, 南昌 330031
南昌大学中国乡村振兴研究院/城乡治理与共同富裕研究中心, 南昌 330031 
刘建生 南昌大学公共政策与管理学院, 南昌 330031
南昌大学中国乡村振兴研究院/城乡治理与共同富裕研究中心, 南昌 330031 
刘卫平 南昌大学公共政策与管理学院, 南昌 330031
南昌大学中国乡村振兴研究院/城乡治理与共同富裕研究中心, 南昌 330031 
吕雅慧 南昌大学公共政策与管理学院, 南昌 330031
南昌大学中国乡村振兴研究院/城乡治理与共同富裕研究中心, 南昌 330031 
摘要点击次数: 1415
全文下载次数: 1558
中文摘要:
      城市近郊区是城乡融合的关键地带,识别该地区村庄类型有助于统筹城乡发展格局。本研究以江西省抚州市临川区为研究对象,基于“三生”功能视角构建临川区村庄发展适宜性评价体系,利用空间自相关揭示其空间集聚特征,采用村庄类型识别系统划定339个行政村的村庄类型,进而提出村庄发展策略。结果表明:临川区村庄发展适宜度指数总体较高,生产功能、生活功能和生态功能指数平均值分别为0.592、0.585和0.466,前二者在空间上呈现“北强南弱”的分布格局;临川区村庄发展适宜度具有显著的空间集聚特征,具体表现为生产功能和生活功能指数的“北热南冷”以及生态功能指数的“中间冷边缘热”;临川区村庄类型分为 4类 2型,城郊融合类与集聚提升类中的集聚发展型村庄是乡村振兴的重点发展对象。根据村庄类型识别结果提出以地类管控为基础的村庄差异化发展策略,可以明确村域国土空间的优化布局,推动城乡深度融合。
英文摘要:
      Suburban areas are the key zones for the integration of urban and rural areas, and identifying the types of villages in these areas aids in coordinating urban and rural areas' development patterns. Linchuan District's village development evaluation system was built using the“production-life-ecological”function perspective. A village typology identification system was used to classify the 339 administrative villages into different village types, and spatial autocorrelation analysis was used to reveal its spatial clustering characteristics. Subsequently, village development strategies were proposed. The results indicated that:the overall level of village development in Linchuan District is relatively high, with average indices of 0.592, 0.585, and 0.466 for production function, living function, and ecological function, respectively, indicating a distribution pattern of stronger development in the north and weaker development in the south. The suitability for village development in the Linchuan District exhibits significant spatial clustering characteristics, most notably in the“north hot, south cold”pattern for production and living function indices, as well as the“centre cold, edge cold”patterns for ecological function indices. Linchuan District's villages are divided into four categories and two types, with a focus on the development of clusterdriven villages in the urban-rural integration and cluster-enhancement categories for rural revitalization. Based on the results of village type identification, proposing differentiated development strategies for villages based on land use control can provide a clear framework for optimizing the territorial spatial layout and promoting deep urban-rural integration.
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭