|
| 基于生态约束的新疆新和县农村居民点整治分区 |
| Regulation zoning of rural settlement based on ecological constraints in Xinhe County， Xinjiang， China |
| 投稿时间：2022-11-29 修订日期：2023-02-01 |
| DOI：10.13254/j.jare.2022.0851 |
| 中文关键词: 农村居民点，整治分区，生态安全格局，农村居民点网络，新和县 |
| 英文关键词: rural residential area, regulation zoning, ecological security pattern, network of rural settlements, Xinhe County |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目 (41861037) |
| 作者 | 单位 | E-mail | | 尹玉聪 | 新疆大学地理与遥感科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830017
新疆绿洲生态自治区重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830017 | | | 王宏卫 | 新疆大学地理与遥感科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830017
新疆绿洲生态自治区重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830017 | wanghw@xju.edu.cn | | 薛孟琦 | 新疆大学地理与遥感科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830017
新疆绿洲生态自治区重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830017 | | | 魏一鸣 | 新疆大学地理与遥感科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830017
新疆绿洲生态自治区重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830017 | | | 钱田田 | 新疆大学地理与遥感科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830017
新疆绿洲生态自治区重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830017 | | | 余芳瑞 | 新疆大学地理与遥感科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830017
新疆绿洲生态自治区重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830017 | |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1398 |
| 全文下载次数: 1610 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为协调好农村居民点空间布局与区域生态环境的关系，推进农村居民点有效整治分区，本研究以新疆新和县为例，以生态视角为切入点，采用最小阻力模型、引力模型及复杂网络等方法，将景观安全格局与社会网络相结合，基于空间分析结果将新和县农村居民点进行类型划分，并分别提出整治分区策略。结果表明：新和县生态安全格局空间分异明显，重点保护区、次重点保护区、一般保护区和非重点保护区面积占比分别为36.91%、31.38%、20.47%和11.24%，呈现中部、西部及南部以重点保护区为主，西北部、东南部以非重点保护区为主的空间格局；节点联系度空间分布不均，自城镇中心向外围越来越弱，节点强度高值集中在新和镇附近，节点强度低值分布于各乡镇边缘，Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级节点分别为21、36、51个和18个；将新和县农村居民点划分为重点发展型、潜力优化型、控制规模型和搬迁撤并型4种整治类型，面积分别为16.11、17.55、13.83 km2和6.32 km2，并根据存在问题分别制定整治分区方案。研究表明，将生态因素纳入农村居民点整治分区范畴，可为新和县分类推进农村居民点整治、生态安全保障及国土空间规划提供新思路。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The purpose of this paper is to coordinate the relationship between the spatial layout of rural residential areas and regional ecological environment and to promote the effective regulation of rural residential areas. In this study, Xinhe County, Xinjiang was taken as an example. From the ecological perspective, the minimum resistance model, gravity model, and complex network were adopted to combine landscape security pattern with social network. Based on the results of spatial analysis, the rural settlements in Xinhe County were classified into types, and respective regulation zoning strategies were proposed. The results showed that the ecological security pattern of Xinhe County demonstrated obvious spatial differentiation, with 36.91% of key reserves, 31.38% of sub-key reserves, 20.47% of general reserves, and 11.24% of non-key reserves. The central, western, and southern regions were dominated by key reserves, while the northwest and southeast regions were dominated by non-key reserves. The spatial distribution of node linkage degree is uneven, and it weakens further from the urban center to the periphery. The maximum node intensity is concentrated in the vicinity of Xinhe Town, while the minimum node intensity is distributed at the edge of each town. There were 21, 36, 51, and 18 nodes of class Ⅰ, class Ⅱ, class Ⅲ, and class Ⅳ nodes, respectively. The rural residential areas in Xinhe County were divided into four renovation types, namely key development type, potential optimization type, control model, and relocation and withdrawal type, with respective areas of 16.11, 17.55, 13.83 km2, and 6.32 km2; Furthermore, according to the existing problems, the renovation zoning scheme was formulated respectively. It is concluded that incorporating ecological factors into rural residential area consolidation can provide new ideas to promote rural residential consolidation, ecological security, and territorial space planning in Xinhe County. |
| HTML
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
