文章摘要
分层施肥对花生田间氮素损失及吸收利用的影响
The effect of layered fertilization on nitrogen loss, absorption and utilization in peanut fields
投稿时间:2024-05-28  修订日期:2025-04-17
DOI:
中文关键词: 分层施肥  氨挥发  氮素淋溶  花生产量  肥料利用率
英文关键词: layered fertilization  ammonia volatilization  nitrogen leaching  peanut yield  fertilizer use efficiency
基金项目:财政部和农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-13)。
作者单位邮编
钱麟君 青岛农业大学 266109
曹议丹 青岛农业大学 
张彩军 青岛和协生物科技有限公司 
司彤 青岛农业大学 
于晓娜 青岛农业大学 
张晓军 青岛农业大学 
邹晓霞* 青岛农业大学 266109
摘要点击次数: 32
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      摘 要:【目的】探明不同分层施肥管理下花生田间氮素损失和吸收利用情况,可为优化花生施肥管理、推进农业绿色生产提供科学依据。【方法】试验于2019-2020年在青岛农业大学莱阳试验站进行,以‘青花7号’花生品种为供试材料,以常规旋耕施肥为对照,研究了二层和三层施肥处理下不减肥、减肥10%和减肥20%施肥3个施肥量梯度对田间氨挥发、氮素剖面分布、植株氮素积累及氮肥利用效率的影响。【结果】研究发现,在相同施肥量下,二层施肥和三层施肥累积氨挥发量无显著差异,但分层不减肥、减肥10%和减肥20%较常规旋耕施肥分别平均降低15.21%、20.66%和23.62%;各处理土壤氮素均主要以硝态氮的形式发生淋失,分层施肥较常规旋耕施肥存在更高的淋失风险,且相同施肥量下二层施肥淋失风险高于三层施肥;分层施肥显著提高了花生植株氮素积累量,其中以不减肥处理效果最显著(28.46-37.22%);分层施肥可明显提高花生产量,其中,在2019和2020年,二层不减肥、二层减肥10%和三层不减肥花生产量较常规旋耕施肥分别提升20.12%、18.34%、23.08%和26.23%、22.07%、25%,但相同施肥量下二层和三层施肥处理无显著差异;分层施肥处理下肥料偏生产力、农学效率、肥料贡献率和氮肥利用率均高于常规旋耕施肥,在2019年分别提升20.07-42.73%、79.27-104.92%、8.23-14.59%和9.18-12.16%,在2020年分别提升25.00-35.66%、52.08-114.58%、3.69-15.85%、6.21-11.54%。【结论】综上,分层施肥在缓解农田氨挥发和花生增产方面作用显著,但存在一定的淋失风险,最底层的施肥深度可适当调减;结合农机作业能耗成本,生产上推荐采用两层不减肥或减肥10%的施肥方式。
英文摘要:
      Abstract: 【Objectives】Exploring the nitrogen loss, absorption and utilization in peanut fields under different layered fertilization (LF) can provide scientific basis for optimizing peanut fertilization management and promoting green agricultural production. 【Methods】The experiment was conducted at the Laiyang experimental station of Qingdao Agricultural University from 2019 to 2020. The peanut variety 'Qinghua 7' was used as the test material, and conventional broadcast fertilization (CBF) was used as the control. 【Results】The effects of double-layered fertilization (DLF) and triple-layered fertilization (TLF) with zero, 10%, and 20% reduction of fertilizer on ammonia volatilization, nitrogen leaching, plant nitrogen accumulation, and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency were studied. This study found that there was no significant difference in the cumulative ammonia volatilization between DLF and TLF with the same fertilizer amount, but, that of LF with zero, 10%, and 20% reduction was decreased by 15.21, 20.66, and 23.62%, on average, compared with CBF, respectively. Nitrogen loss occurred mainly in the form of nitrate nitrogen under all treatments. The risk of nitrogen leaching was higher under LF than CBF, and the nitrogen leaching of DLF was higher than that of TLF under the same fertilization amount. LF significantly increased the nitrogen accumulation in peanut plants, and the most significant effects were observed under the zero fertilizer reduction treatments (28.46-37.22%). LF significantly increased peanut yield, and the peanut yield under DLF with zero and 10% reduction and TLF with zero reduction was increased by 20.12, 18.34, and 23.08% in 2019, and by 26.23, 22.07, and 25% in 2020, compared with CBF, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between DLF and TLF with the same fertilization amount. Fertilizer partial productivity, agronomic efficiency, fertilizer contribution rate and nitrogen use efficiency under stratified fertilization were higher than those under CBF, and increased by 20.07-42.73%, 79.27-104.92%, 8.23-14.59% and 9.18-12.16%, respectively, in 2019, and by 25-35.66%, 52.08-114.58%, 3.69-15.85%, and 6.21-11.54%, in 2020, respectively. 【Conclusions】In conclusion, LF played a significant role in alleviating ammonia volatilization and increasing peanut yield, but there would be a certain risk of leaching. And the depth of fertilization at the bottom layer should be appropriately adjusted. Considering the energy consumption cost of agricultural machinery, it is recommended to use the DLF with zero and 10% fertilizer reduction in production.
HTML    View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器