文章摘要
秸秆还田配施石灰对水田土壤铜、锌、铅、镉活性的影响
Effects of Crop Straw Returning with Lime on Activity of Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd in Paddy Soil
投稿时间:2016-12-17  
DOI:10.13254/j.jare.2016.0305
中文关键词: 秸秆还田,重金属污染,食品安全,配施石灰
英文关键词: straw returning, heavy metal pollution, food safety, straw returning with lime
基金项目:浙江省农业厅《桐庐县农业“两区”土壤污染治理试点试验》;国家科技支撑计划项目(2014BAD14B04)
作者单位E-mail
倪中应 桐庐县农业和林业技术推广中心, 浙江 桐庐 311500  
沈倩 浙江大学环境与资源学院, 浙江 杭州 310058  
章明奎 浙江大学环境与资源学院, 浙江 杭州 310058 mkzhang@zju.edu.cn 
摘要点击次数: 3997
全文下载次数: 2849
中文摘要:
      秸秆还田是我国培肥地力和增加农田土壤碳固定的重要措施,但进入农田的秸秆存在着活化土壤重金属的风险。为了解不同来源的秸秆对污染水平不同农田土壤重金属活性的影响,采取相应措施防止因秸秆还田对农田土壤重金属的激活,开展了盆栽和田间小区试验研究秸秆还田配施石灰对水田土壤铜、锌、镉、铅活性的影响。盆栽和田间试验在轻度和重度污染 2 种土壤上同时进行。盆栽试验中施用秸秆包括重污染水稻秸秆、轻污染水稻秸秆和轻污染油菜秸秆 3 种,石灰用量设对照(0 kg·hm-2)和石灰处理(750 kg·hm-2)2 个处理;田间小区试验设对照(不施秸秆和石灰)、秸秆还田及秸秆还田+石灰 3 个处理。动态观察了试验过程中土壤有效态重金属、重金属形态及水稻籽粒中重金属积累情况。结果表明,试验初期(前 20 d)秸秆还田显著增加了水田土壤中水溶性有机碳与水溶性重金属的含量;与对照处理比较,水溶性重金属含量以重度污染土壤增幅较为明显。试验后期(60 d 后)秸秆还田对土壤重金属的活性的影响逐渐变得不明显。油菜秸秆还田土壤中水溶性重金属含量低于水稻秸秆还田,重污染水稻秸秆还田土壤中水溶性重金属含量高于低污染水稻秸秆还田。盆栽试验和田间试验的结果都表明,重污染水稻秸秆还田可轻微增加水稻籽粒中镉的积累,但轻度污染水稻秸秆还田与油菜秸秆还田对水稻籽粒镉积累的影响较小;3 种秸秆还田对水稻籽粒铅、铜、锌积累的影响不明显。配施石灰可显著降低土壤中水溶性重金属的含量,降低水稻籽粒中重金属的积累。研究认为,在污染农田管理上应控制重污染水稻秸秆还田,在秸秆还田的同时适量配施石灰。
英文摘要:
      Crop straw returning is an important measure for increasing soil carbon fixation and soil fertility in China, but it also may result in some risk of raising activity of heavy metals in the soil. In order to understand the effects of different sources of crop straw on heavy metals activity in soil with different pollution levels, and to take appropriate measures to prevent the activation of heavy metals in the soil, both pot and field experiments were carried out to study the effects of crop straw returning with lime on activity of Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd in paddy soil. The experiments were carried out in the soils with both light and heavy pollution of heavy metals. In the pot experiment, three straws, including rice straw with heavy pollution of heavy metals, rice straw with light pollution of heavy metals, and rape straw with light pollution of heavy metals, were tested. Two dosages of lime(0 kg·hm-2 and 750 kg·hm-2)were applied. Field experiment had three treatments, ie., control without application of straw and lime, straw returning and straw returning + lime. Soil available heavy metals, accumulation of heavy metals in rice grain, and chemical forms of soil heavy metals were dynamical monitored. The results showed that crop straw returning increased significantly the concentrations of dissolved organic carbon and water soluble heavy metals in paddy soils at the early stage of experiment (in first 20 days). The increase in water soluble heavy metals in the soil with heavy pollution of heavy metals was most obvious as compared with the control treatment. After 60th day of the experiment, the effects of straw returning on the activity of heavy metals in the soil decreased gradually with the time, and became no obvious. The concentrations of water soluble heavy metals in the soil treated with rape straw was generally lower than that of rice straw, while those in the soil treated with heavy pollution of rice straw was higher than low pollution of rice straw. The results of both pot and field experiments showed that the accumulation of Cd in rice grains could be slightly increased by application of rice straw with heavy pollution. However, application rice straw or rape straw with slight pollution had little effects on the accumulation of Cd in rice grain. The effects of all three tested straws on the accumulation of Pb, Cu and Zn in rice grains were not obvious. The content of soil water soluble heavy metals and heavy metals accumulation in rice grain could be significantly reduced by the application of lime. It was suggested that the rice straw returning should be controlled in the field with heavy pollution of heavy metals. When returning straw to the field, it was better to cooperate with the application of lime.
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭