文章摘要
县域乡村“三生”系统发展时空分异与优化决策
Spatiotemporal differentiation and optimizing decision of the “agricultural production-farmer life-rural ecology” system in county villages
投稿时间:2020-04-29  
DOI:10.13254/j.jare.2020.0222
中文关键词: 乡村“三生”系统,耦合协调,乡村可持续发展,功能区,优化决策
英文关键词: "agricultural production-farmer life-rural ecology" system, coupling coordination, rural sustainable development, functional zones, optimizing decisions
基金项目:中国博士后科学基金(2019M662329);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(20YJCZH070);山东大学青年团队项目(IFYT20004);2020年度青岛市社会科学规划研究项目(QDSKL2001033)
作者单位
李进涛 山东大学政治学与公共管理学院, 山东 青岛 266237
山东大学公共治理研究院, 山东 青岛 266237
山东大学生活质量与公共政策研究中心, 山东 青岛 266237 
刘琳 山东大学政治学与公共管理学院, 山东 青岛 266237
山东大学公共治理研究院, 山东 青岛 266237 
王乙杰 山东大学政治学与公共管理学院, 山东 青岛 266237
山东大学公共治理研究院, 山东 青岛 266237 
冷安丽 山东大学政治学与公共管理学院, 山东 青岛 266237
山东大学公共治理研究院, 山东 青岛 266237 
摘要点击次数: 1410
全文下载次数: 1374
中文摘要:
      为了因地施策促进乡村可持续发展,以山东省为例,构建县域乡村地域系统的农业生产、农民生活和农村生态的“三生”评价指标体系,运用空间分析技术和耦合模型开展县域乡村“三生”系统优化决策研究。结果表明:山东省县域乡村“三生”系统具有东北-西南地域分异特征,75.82%的县域乡村子系统处在磨合耦合阶段,乡村可持续性和协调性有待加强。乡村“三生”系统发展功能区具体分为低等协调持续发展区、中协调低持续发展区、低协调中持续发展区、中等协调持续发展区、高协调中持续发展区和高等协调持续发展区等六种类型,以中低协调发展区为主,占总量的72.6%。不同类型县域乡村“三生”系统功能区,应因地制宜、分类施策:鲁西南平原农区等低水平地区通过产业结构调整与转型,提高二三产业结构比例;胶东半岛等中等地区以产业集聚与技术创新为主,形成特色产业品牌;鲁北的高等协调地区以科学发展与示范建设为主,构建成熟乡村发展模式。乡村“三生”系统以耦合协调机理为依据,科学划分县域乡村发展功能区,对县域乡村振兴战略实施与乡村协调发展具有重要启示意义。
英文摘要:
      To implement local policies that promote rural sustainable development, this study constructed an evaluation index system for "agricultural production-farmer life-rural ecology"in county villages, taking Shandong Province as an example, and analyzed the spatiotemporal characteristics of this rural system and the coupling coordination relationship between each subsystem using spatial analysis, an analytic hierarchy process, and a coupling model. The study also divided the development functional areas of the rural regional system in Shandong Province and suggested some decisions by which to optimize rural sustainable development. The research results showed that there was an obvious northeast-southwest regional differentiation in the"agricultural production-farmer life-rural ecology" system in Shandong Province. Of these rural subsystems, 75.82% were still in the coupled running-in phase; the rural sustainability and coordination of these needed to be further strengthened. There were six types of functional zones:low-coordinated and sustainable development, medium-coordinated and low-sustainable development, low-coordinated and medium-sustainable development, medium-coordinated and sustainable development, high-coordinated and medium-sustainable development, and high-level coordinated and sustainable development zones. The functional areas of Shandong Province in which the"agricultural production-farmer life-rural ecology"system being developed was dominated by low- and medium-coordinated development zones that accounted for 72.6% of the total area. The functional areas of the"agricultural production-farmer life-rural ecology"system in the different zones should take measures based on local conditions and classifications. Low-level development zones such as the southwestern plain agricultural areas, in Shandong Province, should adjust their industrial structure and transformation thereof to increase the proportion of the secondary and tertiary industries. The medium development zones such as the Jiaodong Peninsula in Shandong Province should focus mainly on industrial agglomeration and technological innovation to build industrial brands. The high-level development zones in the northern areas of Shandong Provinces should focus on scientific development and construction of demonstration projects to develop mature rural development models. The rural"agricultural production-farmer life-rural ecology"system is based on a coupling coordination mechanism, and classifies the county' s rural development functional zones on a scientific basis. This has important implications for the implementation of the county ' s rural revitalization strategy in Shandong Province and the promotion of rural coordinated development.
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭