文章摘要
耕作方式与氮肥类型对稻田氨挥发、氮肥利用率和水稻产量的影响
Effects of tillage practices and nitrogen sources on NH3 volatilization, nitrogen use efficiency and yield in pad-dy fields in central China
投稿时间:2018-01-12  
DOI:10.13254/j.jare.2018.0015
中文关键词: NH3通量,免耕,有机肥,缓释肥,氮肥吸收利用率
英文关键词: NH3 flux, no-tillage, organic fertilizer, slow-release fertilizer, N recovery efficiency
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31671637);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0301403)
作者单位E-mail
李诗豪 农业部长江中游作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室/华中农业大学植物科学技术学院, 武汉 430070  
刘天奇 农业部长江中游作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室/华中农业大学植物科学技术学院, 武汉 430070  
马玉华 农业部长江中游作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室/华中农业大学植物科学技术学院, 武汉 430070  
李成芳 农业部长江中游作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室/华中农业大学植物科学技术学院, 武汉 430070
长江大学/长江大学主要粮食作物产业化湖北省协同创新中心, 湖北 荆州 434023 
lichengfang@126.com 
摘要点击次数: 2374
全文下载次数: 2253
中文摘要:
      通过大田试验,设置常规翻耕(CT)、免耕(NT)两种耕作方式和不施氮肥(N0)、无机氮肥(IF)、缓释氮肥(SR)、有机无机氮肥配施(IFOF)4种施肥模式,研究其对稻田NH3挥发、氮肥利用率和水稻产量的影响。研究结果表明:耕作方式显著影响NH3挥发,而对氮肥利用率和水稻产量影响不大。与CT处理相比,NT处理NH3挥发量显著提高了15.5%。氮肥施用显著提高了NH3挥发、氮肥利用率和水稻产量。与N0处理相比,IF、SR与IFOF处理NH3挥发量分别提高了150.2%、75.8%与137.8%。氮肥处理中IFOF处理具有最高的氮肥利用率。与IF处理相比,IFOF处理氮肥吸收利用率(NRE)显著提高了43.2%,氮肥偏生产力(NPFP)提高了16.9%,氮肥农学效率(NAE)提高了20.1%;与SR处理相比,IFOF处理NRE显著提高了38.3%,NPFP提高了22.1%,NAE提高了51.3%。IF、SR与IFOF处理较N0处理水稻产量分别提高了43.6%、30.0%与44.4%。本研究结果表明,翻耕下有机无机氮肥配施能有效地降低NH3挥发,提高氮肥利用率和产量,但未来如何达到稻田NH3与温室气体的同步减排需要进一步研究。
英文摘要:
      A field experiment was conducted to assess effects of tillage practices as conventional intensive tillage(CT) and no-tillage(NT) and N sources as no N fertilizer(N0), inorganic N fertilizer(IF), slow-release N fertilizer(SR) and inorganic+organic N fertilizer(IFOF) on NH3 volatilization, N use efficiency and yield in paddy fields in central China. Tillage practices significantly affected NH 3 volatilization, but had no effects on N use efficiency and rice yield. Compared with CT, NT obviously increased NH3 volatilization by 15.5%. N fertilization significantly enhanced NH3 volatilization, N use efficiency and rice yield. Treatments of IF, SR, IFOF remarkably increased NH 3 volatilization by 150.2%, 75.8% and 137.8%, respectively, relative to N0. IFOF treatment showed the highest N use efficiency among N fertilizer treatments. Compared with IF treatment, IFOF treatment significantly enhanced NREN (recovery efficiency) by 43.2%, NPFPN(partial factor productivity) by 16.9% and NAEN (agronomic efficiency) by 20.1%; IFOF treatment significantly enhanced NRE by 38.3%, NPFP by 22.1% and NAE by 51.3% relative to SR treatment. Rice yields under IF, SR and IFOF treatments were significantly 43.6%, 30.0% and 44.4% higher than that under N0 treatment. Our results suggested that CT in combination with IFOF could effectively mitigate NH 3 volatilization and increase N use efficiency and rice yield. However, further investigation is needed to discuss how to synchronously decrease NH3 and greenhouse gas emissions
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭