Advanced Search
Evaluation of the effect of heavy metal immobilization remediation-field experiment study
Received:December 25, 2019  
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
KeyWord:field experiments;Cd contaminated soil;immobilization remediation;effect evaluation
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
HE Ying School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
Technical Center for Soil, Agricultural and Rural Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100012, China 
 
DU Ping Technical Center for Soil, Agricultural and Rural Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100012, China duping@craes.org.cn 
SHI Jing School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
Technical Center for Soil, Agricultural and Rural Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100012, China 
 
QIN Xiao-peng Technical Center for Soil, Agricultural and Rural Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100012, China  
XU Gang School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China  
WU Ming-hong School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China  
Hits: 1450
Download times: 1511
Abstract:
      Based on field experiments, the remediation effect of several immobilization materials was studied, including calcium-magnesia phosphate fertilizer(CMP), medical stone(MS), ferric oxide adsorbent(FA), alumina composite(AC), plant-based organic fertilizer (POF), cow dung(CD)and bone char(BC). The dynamic weighted comprehensive model was established to assess the comprehensive remediation effects. The results demonstrated that the pH of the soil was slightly influenced by applying these materials, increasing by 0.68 and 0.74 units under CMP and MS treatments, respectively. The application of POF, CD and BC increased the soil organic matter content by 3.19, 2.64 g·kg-1 and 1.17 g·kg-1(10.04%, 8.31% and 3.68%)compared with the control check, respectively. Under the dosage of 0.6%, almost all materials showed good immobilization effects, the immobilization efficiency of all materials except POF exceed 18%, and the cadmium content of brown rice was significantly reduced(0.062 to 0.087 mg·kg-1), which was lower than the National Food Safety Standard of 0.2 mg·kg-1. The calculation results of the dynamic weighted comprehensive evaluation method showed that CMP was the most applicable immobilization material in this study, BC and POF come second.