| 郭超,王伟,张博,马栋,吕俊岗.基于虚拟治理成本法的地表水污染类公益诉讼生态环境损害鉴定评估的审查要点研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2023,42(12):2787-2793. |
| 基于虚拟治理成本法的地表水污染类公益诉讼生态环境损害鉴定评估的审查要点研究 |
| Research on review points of ecological environment damage identification and assessment for surface water pollution in public interest litigation based on virtual governance cost method |
| 投稿时间：2023-04-06 |
| DOI：10.11654/jaes.2023-0262 |
| 中文关键词: 虚拟治理成本法 地表水污染 公益诉讼 生态环境损害鉴定评估 技术性证据专门审查 |
| 英文关键词: virtual governance cost method surface water pollution public interest litigation ecological environment damage identification and assessment special review of technical evidence |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 519 |
| 全文下载次数: 383 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 虚拟治理成本法是一种常用的生态环境损害鉴定评估方法，对于公益诉讼案件中环境损害责任认定具有关键作用。司法实践中，检察机关亟需加强对第三方机构出具的环境损害司法鉴定意见或生态环境损害鉴定评估报告的专业审查，避免因案件证据质量存在瑕疵而影响司法公信力。本文以一起典型污染环境刑事附带民事公益诉讼案为例，分析了生态环境损害鉴定评估重难点问题，从检察机关审查环境损害司法鉴定意见或生态环境损害鉴定评估报告的角度，研究提出地表水污染类公益诉讼案生态环境损害鉴定评估的审查要点，对于提升检察机关公益诉讼办案质效、推动公益诉讼检察高质量发展具有重要意义。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| As a common method for ecological environment damage identification and assessment, the virtual governance cost method plays a key role in the determination of environmental damage liability in public interest litigation cases. In judicial practice, procuratorial organs urgently need to strengthen the professional review of the judicial opinion on environmental damage or the ecological environment damage identification and assessment report issued by third-party organizations to avoid affects on judicial credibility through defects in the quality of evidence. Taking a typical case of environmental pollution with criminal incidental civil public interest litigation as an example, this paper analyzes the key and difficult problems in ecological environment damage identification and assessment and studies and presents review points of ecological environment damage identification and assessment for surface water pollution in public interest litigation cases from the perspective of the judicial opinion on environmental damage or the ecological environment damage identification and assessment report reviewed by procuratorial organs. It is of great significance for procuratorial organs to improve the quality and efficiency of public interest litigation and promote high-quality development of public interest litigation prosecution. |
| HTML
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
